To the content
Notariaat Wellens
Menu

Current Affairs / Real estate and gifts · Flanders

Dividing previously gifted real estate? Tax detour rejected

Illustration for Dividing previously gifted real estate? Tax detour rejected

Under a Minute

In a prior ruling, the Flemish administration saw no genuine contribution debt before the planned division of previously gifted real estate. The intermediaries in that case were considered artificial, resulting in transfer duties rather than division duties being applicable.

How Can We Help?

First lay out the deeds of gift, current ownership structures and desired final division side by side. We chart the civil steps and potential registration tax.

Read the source at Flemish Tax Administration

Would You Like to Know More?

You complete the message in the chosen app. If the text is not transferred, you can select and copy it here.

FURTHER EXPLANATION · 2 MIN READ

The administration looked through the steps

The Flemish Tax Administration published on 4 August 2026 a prior ruling concerning real estate previously gifted to two daughters. The family wanted to first contribute goods before a later division, then assign other goods to each daughter. The question was whether transfer duties could be applied to that final division.

The administration did not follow this reasoning. It saw no real contribution debt in the facts presented to explain the intermediary steps. The planned contribution and division were jointly assessed as artificial acts aimed at avoiding normal taxation. Therefore, transfer duties rather than division duties were considered in this case.

The original gift remains guiding

After a gift, the deed determines who became owner, in what proportion, with which encumbrances and with what reserved usufruct. These details do not disappear when the family later seeks a different practical division. A later exchange, allocation or transfer must start from the rights that really exist, not from an intermediary created only on paper.

A reserved usufruct also deserves separate attention. In the ruling, the relevant usufruct could not simply be treated as freely contributable property. The civil-law nature of each right partly determines which act is possible and which registration tax applies.

Draw the current and desired situation first

Example: two children each received half of two properties years ago. Now one child wants property A and the other property B. Economically sensible, but legally a new transfer is necessary to move from shared rights to separate ownership. Values, possible charges, usufruct and stipulations from the deed of gift must be examined beforehand.

Make a simple diagram with current owners and desired final state. Add the deeds of gift, ownership titles and recent valuations. Notariaat Wellens can then compare possible routes without assuming a fiscal outcome. Also map any loans, charges and reimbursements between family members. Note who can bear which costs and any charges. This prior ruling applies only to its own facts but warns that the full sequence of acts is reviewed. Want to lay out the options calmly? Contact us before new arrangements.

View the reel on this topic

Image and music

Illustrative images. Piano: J.S. Bach · variation 4 · piano: Kimiko Ishizaka · Open Goldberg Variations (2012) · CC0.

Recording and free use licence

"The greater the irreversibility, the less I let myself be rushed by artificial haste."
Paul Wellens